I am sometimes asked 'Why are you so happy?' and my first honest answer is that in this moment, "I am not happy, however I am (usually and often) content."
Contentment happens and allows alot of room for other emotions to be.
This doesn't mean I have perfect days, with no frustrations or that things go my way at all times.
It also doesn't mean I don't have complaints or little life happenings which I would not have loved to have been different. But in all honesty, I don't want to be happy all the time.
Just as I don't want to be sad all the time.
I don't want to be delighted all the time.
I don't want to be any one experience all the time.
I think our emotional spectrum is amazing. I feel fortunate to experience so many parts of that spectrum. I love that I have the capacity to experience many emotions over the course of a day.
Certainly, lingering sadness, resentment, regret or fear are not emotional states I wish to stay in, however I am glad for the experience because there is usually some information about my environment or about myself to be gained from the emotional moment.
I work to an emotional foundation that is not complex.
I believe we come into this world with an basic ability to feel alert, discomfort and contentment.
Unlike many emotions and feeling models and theories, I do not believe that happiness and fear are at our core. I believe both are learnt and where being happy develops from contentment, fear develops from being alert. Depending on your environment and what you have to learn from, feeling happy or scared or irritated will all develop with different strength and with varying priority.
I also do not believe being happy is essential for survival or life. I believe it is an emotion that is born from contentment and it can definitely help shift a perspective and help you survive, but a life without happiness will not automatically mean you have a bad life.
What is it about this generation and this society that has come to believe that a certain level of happiness is essential to living a good life?
I may not feel happy over the course of a day, a week or perhaps even a month. However, dependant on what else is part of my emotional diet - it is not necessarily a bad time. I do not search for feeling happy, neither do I feel that not having a happy experience is a problem. A bit like ice-cream, I like it and I would probably gladly eat icecream daily, however if i don't have icecream for a month, I will be ok.
Believe it or not - if my days and weeks are filled with a variety of emotions from the simple ones to the more complex, then I am alive and I am living. As I am also receptive to my environment and interact with people who have the ability to input into my life, I may experience sadness, confusion, curiosity, fear, despair, satiation, excitement, fulfilment, dread, enthusiasm, anger and so the list continues. I would begin to be concerned if a single emotion became dominant - and yes, that would include happiness. Because isn't there something manic and even physiologically dangerous about sustaining a single state for a long period of time.
This is part of the distress surrounding stress. In itself, stress is a natural and needed state. However, as people live with an expectation or hope that stress will diminish, while not necessarily making any personal change for that to occur - the permanence of the state creates mental and physical health problems. The occurrence is natural. Cyclical resolution is ideal. Permanence is not.
So too, being happy.
No, thank you.
I'm content. That will do nicely.
A blog that captures moments and perspectives in life. Life improvements can be made slowly and gently or under intense and dynamic conditions. Either way, it is your attitude and perspective that has the most power and influence in life.
Wednesday, 16 August 2017
Monday, 14 August 2017
Deprivation - good, bad or disabling?
Today i have found myself wondering about the impact of deprivation. I have no doubt this is a topic which could be written about at length. This version however is just a step through of my thoughts as they arise.
It started with a pondering, whether I, as a result of a generation of parents who thought they
were doing the right thing by depriving their children of things - have
ended up disabled. Without meaning a
permanent disability, however, without knowing and learning and
understanding how we are maintaining the disability 'given' to us for
our own good ... we will perpetuate it within ourselves and, naturally,
pass it on to our children.
I have known that living with the perspective of deprivation
is not a healthy one. As a result I adjust my experiences and my views
as often as I can. However, what would I need to do differently to not
experience initial moments as loss, deprivation or missing out in the first place.
How do I go about healing this limp?
In addition, for as long as I have to 'work' on being ok with life being ample and having completely enough and even more being ok too ... this work is a reminder that the step into abundance, across all topics and moments in life, isn't the natural or automatic one. It also means that I will have difficulty naturally letting my children have enough or seeing them want more.
This may not apply to my 2 year old, however it may start applying to a 6 or 7 year old and by the time they are in their teens, the attitude may have silently become its full grown self.
Whether
we come from an upbringing of deficit or an upbringing of ample - as
soon as we become adults we adjust what we do and what we have to
matching what we want in some way. Some people go the extreme - and
just get everything. THis is more a sign of not really knowing who you
are, rather than making up a deficit. For others, they become focused
on providing for themselves the things that they missed out on - this
can become obsessive. Even people who have
plenty, can act to this approach too. Part of the excitement of liking
something, is wanting more of it. True in relationships as much as new
toys, activities or friendships. Over time often a balance is found.
But what if a balance cannot be found because of the constant pull of deprivation being 'good' and abundance or more being 'bad'.
Even
over an ordinary lunch this can be demonstrated. While I sit in a dark lounge room
... one person may turn on two sets of lights which to my taste, give adequate light. A moment later, the person
concerned about electricity use, will turn one set off. They will
determine this to be enough. Of course, everyone adjusts. There is
after all more light than there was a moment ago. however, is it really
enough - well, out of 4 people, 3 would say that it was still dark.
You couldn't ask the 4th person because their concern or reasoning will
have skewed their perception of what was sufficient.
But just in this simple moment - every person is living in a form of deprivation.
And yet, if someone was to comment about how dark it is. There would be a reaction from the 4th person ... and perhaps even
person 2 and 3.. to say "But you have light!"
Isn't
it true though - that you can have light, but not have enough? you can
have food, but not have enough? you can have a relationship, but not
really have enough?
So after all that, where am I going?
Well.
I was thinking about this in relation to families, parents and children
and basically any interaction where one person is recieving and another
person is giving or controlling. As a child I grew up very grateful
for time I had with my father, beyond appreciation though, I was aware
how tenuous and fragile that attention was. In fact, I knew that the
attention was not dependant on me or what I wanted, it was completely
dependant on what my father wanted and if he happened to have nothing to
do for a minute or two. I knew as soon as something of greater priority would arise, there wouldn't be a second thought about him moving on.
My mother was a different dynamic, but again,
regardless of what my mother would say she gave or did, it was not
enough nor what I wanted or needed. There was light - but it wasn't
enough! Does that make me ungrateful? Or honest? Does it make me self aware? Or does it make me greedy? In fact it doesn't matter, because I didn't request more at the time and years later when I recognised the gap and the consequences it had for me, it was something too difficult for my mother to look at from my perspective.
So -
my mothers story ... and probably my fathers ... is that I was given
enough.
Actually I was given MORE than enough. And they are right.
From their perspective they were. However
My story is that I had an emotionally and attention deprived
childhood. It wasn't that I was given no attention, in fact the focus upon me was immense, as was the expectation and potential to disappoint or say and do things which were disapproved of. Neither was it because there was no emotion around me, there certainly was, but it was parent centred and I learnt to read, cater and facilitate to others sooner than understanding my own emotional space.
I have no argument with the fact I was given enough food,
clothing or shelter ...but even those things did not meet my wants. They were adequate and I don't think I complained. I
knew they were enough, and I was grateful for what I got because I knew
it could all be taken away quickly. However, one bite of chocolate once
a week didn't feel like enough. Would one bar of chocolate, once a
month, have been better? I don't know.
All said, I didn't really formulate many wants because there would have been no point. But even if I had - they would have been 'safe' wants, ie, wants which would have been safe to expresseven if I had recieved them all .. would I have been satisfied? Or was it really all too late - because of the mindset I had learnt?
These
questions are just sitting with me, not needing direct answers now.
However, when I look to my children. More specifically my older daughters and their wants, I easily determine something to be
excessive or unnecessary, so I want to reflect and check whether I am
inadvertently still acting to 'deprivation' and that having to wait for something to be fulfilled is 'good' vs 'bad'
I do not think I will change anything today.
I do not know for certain this changes anything in the future.
However, something niggles and for those who know me, when things niggle I'll pull the thread until something unravels!
I wonder if or when my concept of deprivation being 'good' start?
At age 7? or 12?
I know that my approach to parenting does not work to deprivation
- simply to patterns and stages. So I know that I have looked at this
from an action POV a while ago. This is me looking at this from a
belief perspective and wondering whether I have good/bad in action and
whether it is impacting how I see my daughters being given things or
not....and even myself.
As usual - there is no real beginning or end to this reflection. Just sharing.
No replies needed .... but of course, thoughts are always welcome.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)