The Double Standard in MAFS: Physical vs. Emotional Aggression
In an episode of Married at First Sight (MAFS) (Ep 12, 2025), Paul punching a door became the central issue—replayed, analyzed, and repeatedly condemned. The show made sure viewers understood: this is unacceptable behavior.
On-screen warnings, repeated discussions, and expert commentary emphasized how aggression—even if not intended to intimidate—can still create fear and unease. However, while accountability was applied to Paul, it was overwhelmingly focused on shame, rather than a meaningful path forward.
From what was shown on screen, barely 15 seconds was dedicated to asking Paul whether he had sought therapy or learned emotional regulation techniques. There was no discussion about how to handle emotions constructively, no practical tools offered, and no focus on growth made apparent in the episodes.
Image by PublicDomainPictures from Pixabay
The Pattern of Response
The response to Paul’s aggression followed a predictable pattern:
- Public Shaming: Paul was repeatedly reminded that his behavior was unacceptable.
- Social Superiority: Others distanced themselves from him, reinforcing their own moral high ground.
- Focus on Guilt, Not Growth: Rather than being offered tools to manage emotions, it was obvious that the experts needed to see shame, remorse and disappointment from Paul.
Apparently, in other social media pathways, there was follow up provided for Paul and Carina. Paul was banned from consuming alcohol for the remainder of the series (or during filming) and was made to attend weekly therapy on Saturdays.
So while Paul was scrutinized, as well as given paths of action and improvement as management or support. Another type of aggression was left completely unchecked—Adrian’s emotional aggression and coercive control over Awhina.
The Hidden Problem: Adrian’s Emotional Aggression
While Paul was publicly held accountable for his one-time physical outburst, Adrian’s persistent emotional aggression was ignored.
- Adrian has consistently displayed controlling, dismissive, and manipulative behaviors.
- Unlike Paul, he has faced zero accountability on-screen.
- There were no warnings, no expert intervention, and no direct conversations calling out his behavior.
Where were the clear messages saying:
- "See this? This is manipulation."
- "This is emotional aggression and control."
- "This is unacceptable behavior."
They didn’t exist.
The Impact on Awhina: Silence as Complicity
The most troubling part of this selective accountability is its impact on Awhina.
- No one has looked her in the eye and said: "What you are experiencing is abuse."
- No one has acknowledged: "You keep giving Adrian chances—not because he’s changing, but because you’re hopeful, attracted to him, or conditioned to see his behavior as normal."
- No one has asked: "This person is repeatedly showing you that he is not focused on you. Why are you continually giving this person chances?"
Adrian’s emotional manipulation is in many ways much more harmful than Paul’s door punch because:
- It is ongoing and calculated, it is not a single moment of emotional overwhelm.
- He has no intention of changing—his arrogance, smirks, and ability to control conversations keep him in power.
- His behavior is normalized—so much so that even Awhina (nor the group, nor the experts!) don't seem to recognize the problem.
- It is direct and targeted towards Aphina, to ensure she backs off or is diminished enough to get weaker, less certain.
If the show is willing to condemn Paul’s physical aggression, why does it remain silent about Adrian’s coercive control and manipulation?
Where Does Punching a Wall Fit in Aggression?
Punching a wall is a form of physical aggression, but intent and impact determine how it should be interpreted. Not to reduce its seriousness, but by better understanding its source and intention it becomes possible to address and action and decrease the chance of reoccurance.
1. Physical Aggression (Externalized Anger)
- Intent: To intimidate, instill fear, or indirectly threaten others.
- Impact: Creates an environment of fear, where others may feel unsafe or coerced. eg. Punching a wall during an argument to scare someone.
- Severity: Moderate to Severe, depending on frequency and context.
2. Self-Destructive Aggression (Internalized Anger)
- Intent: To release frustration or self-punish, rather than hurt others.
- Impact: Leads to physical self-harm and reinforces unhealthy coping mechanisms eg. Someone punches a wall out of self-directed anger, injuring themselves.
- Severity: Moderate to Severe, especially if repeated.
3. Impulsive Emotional Outburst (Poor Emotional Regulation, Not Intended as Aggression)
- Intent: A momentary loss of control, rather than a conscious effort to intimidate or manipulate.
- Impact: May cause distress to others but is often followed by regret and an attempt to repair the situation. eg. A person punches a wall out of frustration but does not intend to scare anyone.
- Severity: Mild to Moderate, but can escalate if unchecked.
Key Considerations
Punching a wall is often a red flag for poor emotional regulation, aggression issues, or deep frustration.
While punching a wall may not always be meant to intimidate others, it is a sign of unprocessed anger—one that can become more dangerous over time if not properly addressed.If done to intimidate, it is a form of coercive control and emotional abuse.
If self-directed, it may indicate self-harm tendencies or difficulty managing emotions healthily.
If impulsive but rare, it suggests a need for better coping mechanisms before it escalates.
The Healthier Way: What Should Have Happened?
For Paul:
Instead of just shaming him, Paul should have been guided toward constructive emotional regulation techniques.
- Practical tools should have been introduced:
- "Here’s how to process anger in the moment."
- "It is ok to say I'm going to get noisy, best if you give me space" and then scream into a pillow
- "Here is a physical, verbal and behavioural in the moment option instead of externalizing frustration physically."
- The experts should have reinforced that learning regulation takes time and effort.
- The focus should have been on growth—not just guilt and shame.
For Adrian:
- He should have been confronted with his emotional abuse:
- "Listen to your own words. This is manipulation."
- "Your tone is dismissive and controlling."
- "This is toxic behavior, and it’s not okay."
- Awhina should have been supported in recognizing the patterns of coercion and control.
- On-screen warnings should have been displayed—just as they were with Paul.
For Awhina:
- She should have been given tools to recognize and respond to his tactics:
- "When Adrian shifts blame, here’s how to bring the focus back to accountability."
- "If he invalidates your feelings, here’s how to stand your ground."
- "When someone consistently refuses to take responsibility, that’s a red flag—not a challenge to ‘fix’ them."
- Just as Carina was encouraged to express any of the impact, Awhina should have been encouraged to identify why she keeps giving Adrian chances despite his refusal to change.
- "Listen to your own words. This is manipulation."
- "Your tone is dismissive and controlling."
- "This is toxic behavior, and it’s not okay."
For Awhina:
- She should have been given tools to recognize and respond to his tactics:
- "When Adrian shifts blame, here’s how to bring the focus back to accountability."
- "If he invalidates your feelings, here’s how to stand your ground."
- "When someone consistently refuses to take responsibility, that’s a red flag—not a challenge to ‘fix’ them."
- Just as Carina was encouraged to express any of the impact, Awhina should have been encouraged to identify why she keeps giving Adrian chances despite his refusal to change.
For All Couples: Reflective Questions on Aggression
Instead of isolating Paul’s act as the only harmful aggression, the show could have introduced reflective questions for all participants:
- Do I raise my voice, talk over, or dismiss my partner in conversations?
- Have I ever made my partner feel small, embarrassed, or “crazy” during an argument?
- Do I use silent treatment, withholding affection, or guilt-tripping as a way to control situations?
- Do I minimize my partner’s feelings and make them question their own experiences?
- Do I blame my partner when I’m feeling overwhelmed, instead of taking responsibility for my emotions?
These questions would have encouraged self-awareness and accountability across the board—not just for one person.
Final Thought: Accountability Needs to Be Consistent
Aggression comes in many forms. While society is quick to condemn visible violence, covert aggression—such as manipulation, control, and coercion—often goes unnoticed.
To build healthy relationships, we need to:
✅ Hold all forms of aggression accountable—not just physical acts.
✅ Provide practical tools for emotional regulation instead of relying on shame.
✅ Empower individuals to recognize and set boundaries against emotional manipulation.
✅ Let it be known that violence or aggression may take time to process. People watching or exposed in any way may not be able to voice their experience or the impact for some time afterwards. Be prepared to hear echos of pain or concern. Every moment matters regardless when a discussion arises.
If only physical aggression is called out, we fail to address the full scope of harm in relationships. Until accountability is applied fairly, selective outrage will continue to protect the most dangerous aggressors—the ones who harm without being noticed.